简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
OliverAdams0102 · 2025年11月19日 09:34 UTC
We had a delivery query where the reply assumed a harmless cosmetic mark, although that wasn't what our photos showed. Send the overall shifted support and the close damage view together, and ask for a qualified inspection route before any power-on attempt.
6分Those views are already in the ticket. Their new reply offers a replacement plastic cover and repeats the startup request.
11分Has a technical person actually reviewed the damage, or are these still sales replies? A cover offer doesn't establish what happened behind it.
7分Sales only, as far as I can establish. No technician named. I have asked for one rather than accepting the cover offer.
8分Our inspection booking stalled on that distinction. Sales said yes; nobody technical had agreed the scope.
6分Tell whoever schedules installation that the equipment remains awaiting assessment. Otherwise the arriving cover can get mistaken for the whole problem being resolved, and somebody books people around it.
18分Liam, did you use a local assessor in the end or somebody the seller arranged?
5分Local assessor, after the scope was agreed. Not simply whoever could come soonest.
4分Oliver, is the seller willing to arrange that qualified assessment and state who pays? That's the next answer I'd ask for, not another parcel of plastic.
19分And give the assessor the complete delivery account, including the moved support. Don't reduce the request to inspecting the cover just because that is the replacement sales knows how to quote.
15分A technical contact has now been assigned and asked for the complete photo set. No visit or inspection scope agreed yet. The setup remains unpowered and the cover offer is still unanswered.
13分Please post what assessment they propose. A named contact is progress, but I'd like to hear whether they address the shifted support as well as the visible enclosure.
6分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .