简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
ZaraAllen0308 · 2026年1月19日 22:39 UTC
Recover the unannotated versions and link both to that plate's physical judgement, then have the guessed defect labels removed from the working set.
8分Unmarked originals found. The plate is accepted under quality's viewing method. We also have a rejected faceplate with a faint line near its edge.
14分Keep that faint reject in every lighting comparison. Ours became wonderfully quiet when we changed the view, including the bit we actually needed to see. Not the sort of quiet you buy a camera for.
10分And confirm both plates are seated as intended in those images; a different seat can make your lighting comparison answer the wrong question.
2分One accepted-plate photo is tilted on a burr in the holder. Tooling found it during inspection. That photo is out of the lighting comparison, but retained with the seating fault.
14分Can the loader see that corner in normal use, Zara? We had to change the access to a support before the seating check meant much outside the designer's hands.
12分Not from the loading side. Tooling is reviewing visibility as well as repairing the burr. Mia, I've kept the faint reject on the repeat list; no new light ordered.
10分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .