ZaraAllen0308 · 19 Jan 2026, 22:39 UTC
Recover the unannotated versions and link both to that plate's physical judgement, then have the guessed defect labels removed from the working set.
8 pointsUnmarked originals found. The plate is accepted under quality's viewing method. We also have a rejected faceplate with a faint line near its edge.
14 pointsKeep that faint reject in every lighting comparison. Ours became wonderfully quiet when we changed the view, including the bit we actually needed to see. Not the sort of quiet you buy a camera for.
10 pointsAnd confirm both plates are seated as intended in those images; a different seat can make your lighting comparison answer the wrong question.
2 pointsOne accepted-plate photo is tilted on a burr in the holder. Tooling found it during inspection. That photo is out of the lighting comparison, but retained with the seating fault.
14 pointsCan the loader see that corner in normal use, Zara? We had to change the access to a support before the seating check meant much outside the designer's hands.
12 pointsNot from the loading side. Tooling is reviewing visibility as well as repairing the burr. Mia, I've kept the faint reject on the repeat list; no new light ordered.
10 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .