简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The same faceplate has a scratch in only one camera view

IsabelBell0648 · 2025年9月21日 18:48 UTC

已关闭
IS
IsabelBell0648
I have a faceplate which looks clean to me on the bench, but one image from our proposed FR10 inspection setup has a bright diagonal line. The next view has no line. Both pictures are in the reject examples. I do not want to teach the students that a bright line automatically means a scratch. What should I ask quality to establish before we use these examples?

14 条回复

AD
AdaAbbott0042

Ask quality to examine that actual faceplate and identify the area in question. Your bench impression is useful, but the teaching example needs their acceptance decision too.

7
IS
IsabelBell0648

They have it now. I marked the image location, not the face itself. There is another faceplate with a visible groove, and the two arrived together in an unlabelled sleeve.

21
AD
AdaAbbott0042

Good choice about the marking. Can you still tell which photographs belong to each piece?

19
OM
OmarBennett0752

Give them separate storage and IDs before taking more pictures. I mean an ID that stays with each part between sessions, not just two different image filenames.

18
IS
IsabelBell0648

Yes, Ada. The corner hole appears in opposite places because one piece is a different version. The photographs can be sorted. I have asked quality to retain both parts separately as Omar suggests.

20
JO
JonasBrooks0807

Different versions too? Do they even have the same finish requirement?

11
IS
IsabelBell0648

They share the cosmetic requirement on drawing revision F, but their hole pattern differs. Quality confirmed that before examining the faces. I had only checked the finish note myself.

20
CA
CarlaAbbott0053

We had a polished sample that was called scratched because its reflection crossed the camera view. Repeating the photograph without changing any settings was a cheap way to show how much presentation mattered. Keep the genuine groove sample in the comparison as well; losing the bright line is not enough if you also lose the defect.

8
JO
JonasBrooks0807

And use the intended version for tuning. The other can still teach the point.

16
IS
IsabelBell0648

Quality accepted the diagonal-line piece and rejected the grooved one. Carla, we can repeat the accepted piece in the nest before changing lights. Jonas, the accepted piece is our intended version; I will request a rejected example of that version too.

14
CA
CarlaAbbott0053

Keep the full frames from that repeat. Close crops can hide the small seating difference that you are trying to explain to the students.

5
AD
AdaAbbott0042

Who will replace the wrongly labelled copies in the lesson material? There may be more than the camera folder by now.

12
IS
IsabelBell0648

That is mine to fix. I found a copy in the handout as well. Thank you for asking, Ada; correcting the camera folder alone would have left a rather confusing lesson.

8
OM
OmarBennett0752

Leave a note with the retained samples saying why each was accepted or rejected. The next tutor should not have to reconstruct this from your photographs.

18

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .