Pickup corrections are hiding the pattern

LiamAli0229 · 2025年2月1日 17:21 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

LI
LiamAli0229
I charted our FR5 tray-unloading stoppages and found that every recovery includes a small teaching change. Nobody records which way the spacer block was leaning before the correction. Yesterday I watched one jaw meet the block before the other. The tray appears seated. Appears is doing some work there. What cheap checks would help maintenance distinguish the tray, fingers and mounting before another point gets nudged?

8 条回复

SA
SaraCarter0983

Compare the two finger faces with the cell isolated. Look for wear and trapped debris.

16分
LI
LiamAli0229

Maintenance found compacted plastic in one finger recess. They removed it and checked the mounting. The jaw contact looks more even now, though we haven't tried the full tray set.

13分
SA
SaraCarter0983

Try identified trays under the approved test procedure. Don't call the first clean pickup the result.

25分
LI
LiamAli0229

Three trays behaved; one still presents the block at an angle. So the debris mattered, but it wasn't our entire collection of problems. That tray is set aside for inspection.

11分
SA
SaraCarter0983

Check its pocket and seating surfaces. Two causes can produce the same ugly pickup.

7分
CH
ChloeBennett0744

Can you relate the historical teaching changes to those tray identities? It may be impossible if they were not recorded, but that would explain why the old trend cannot establish arm drift.

14分
LI
LiamAli0229

We cannot. The old records say only 'tray changed'. I've added tray identity and the observed symptom to our interruption log. It won't rescue the history, but the next investigation should have less archaeology.

9分
FA
FarahChan1113

Measure that set-aside tray against a known good one before ordering replacements; the visible lean might come from how the block sits in the pocket rather than the tray outline.

17分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .