简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
RobinAli0251 · 2025年3月21日 01:58 UTC
Establish the measurement datum and restraint condition for each column; the shared word height does not make the values comparable.
16分The jig column measures from its baseplate. The bench column appears to use the underside of the finished bracket. No instruction for how it was supported.
5分Mark the bench condition unknown until you find supporting evidence; subtracting the two columns will not isolate release distortion.
13分Are any of the measured brackets still available with their inspection numbers? Comparing one identified part using an agreed setup might be cheaper than trying to reconstruct every old entry.
7分Useful for establishing present measurements, though it cannot prove how the historical bench value was obtained.
8分Found two retained brackets with matching numbers. Quality will measure them against the drawing. The old jig has also been altered since those sheets, so its current shim stack is not evidence of the old setup.
22分Keep the current jig revision separate in the review; otherwise you will accidentally explain old measurements with newer hardware.
17分Quality confirmed one retained part is outside the finished height requirement. The records cannot tell us when it departed from nominal. We have excluded the undocumented shim stack from the new fixture specification.
8分Specify the missing measurements for the pilot: incoming fit-up, located condition and released acceptance, with traceable part identities and defined setups.
13分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .