简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
GraceBell0668 · 2026年2月1日 18:28 UTC
Two views are worth comparing if they reveal different required areas or defects; keep the physical references and the intended seating variation in both, rather than choosing each view from a different convenient sample.
11分Same two covers in both candidate views. One shows the face mark, the other the edge scratch. Quality says neither view alone covers what they need.
11分Are face and edge views both possible with the intended holder? Or are you holding the cover differently for the second picture? That's the bit I'd want the fixture person to see before the camera comparison gets too settled
10分Also try taking the cover out and putting it back. Not a heroic tilt, just normal reseating. My nicest repeat image was really a don't-touch-anything image.
16分Robin, yes, but let Grace answer Victor's holder question too. A second image that needs somebody's fingers under the cover is a different job.
8分Victor, it's supported by the proposed holder in both, no hand propping it up. Robin, repeated reseats are on the comparison sheet. We hadn't included removal between captures until now.
11分Who chose the accepted and rejected examples? Two physical covers give you a useful starting comparison, but normal finish variation and a different reject location may change which view earns its place.
15分Priya's point hurts my tidy two-photo plan, but yes. Do the duller accepted ones still look acceptable in both views?
21分Quality picked the first pair. They've added duller accepted covers and a rejected scuff by the other hole. Camera engineer is comparing the same set, not swapping samples when a view struggles.
20分What will the application show if one required view is missing? Worth asking now, while two-view means a proposed inspection rather than two attractive files in a folder
8分Comparison done with quality: both views together retain the required marks across the selected finish and reseating examples. Either view alone misses a reject. We've chosen the two-view arrangement for development, not a threshold from the original band labels.
16分Victor, a missing required view will stay incomplete. Controls has that requirement. Thanks for raising it before somebody called the remaining picture a pass.
17分Good to hear why the second view stayed. I'd keep those missed-reject examples in the design note; otherwise someone will offer to simplify it later.
10分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .