简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

FR5 component-case supports missing from the shared layer review

MeiBarnes0603 · 2026年6月18日 03:23 UTC

回复讨论
ME
MeiBarnes0603
I know a printed face only helps if packing preserves its relationship to the supports. Our FR5 alternating pattern has a more basic gap: some rotated cases bridge their preferred bearing direction. What should packaging and tooling review together before we accept it?

6 条回复

RO
RobinArcher0425

Are the filled-case bearing areas shown over the layer beneath on the same revision as the tool's release path? That would expose which spaces the two requirements share.

25
ME
MeiBarnes0603

Not yet. Packaging has a filled-case detail; tooling has a single-case release sketch. The actual neighbouring cases don't appear around the tool.

7
LI
LinAbbott0009

Then ask for the placement sequence, not just a superimposed final picture. Tool space can disappear as the layer fills, and somebody also needs to explain how partial pallets get finished

20
RA
RaviBrown0911

Who owns that combined drawing, Mei? Separate comments won't reconcile themselves just because both teams are copied on the email

2
ME
MeiBarnes0603

The integrator has agreed to own it, with dispatch reviewing partial finishing. Thanks Lin for the sequence point; we have requested the missing views, not approved the pattern.

11
RO
RobinArcher0425

Has that joint view arrived now? Interested whether it exposes a support conflict, a withdrawal conflict, or both; the current separate sketches cannot settle that.

5

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。