I know a printed face only helps if packing preserves its relationship to the supports. Our FR5 alternating pattern has a more basic gap: some rotated cases bridge their preferred bearing direction. What should packaging and tooling review together before we accept it?
Are the filled-case bearing areas shown over the layer beneath on the same revision as the tool's release path? That would expose which spaces the two requirements share.
Then ask for the placement sequence, not just a superimposed final picture. Tool space can disappear as the layer fills, and somebody also needs to explain how partial pallets get finished
The integrator has agreed to own it, with dispatch reviewing partial finishing. Thanks Lin for the sequence point; we have requested the missing views, not approved the pattern.
Has that joint view arrived now? Interested whether it exposes a support conflict, a withdrawal conflict, or both; the current separate sketches cannot settle that.