One bezel, three moving bright lines, three scratch labels. No physical defect locations recorded. Tuning is premature.
our FR10 bezel examples disagree with each other
RaviCarter0998 · 2025年10月13日 09:43 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Tie each image to the identified physical bezel and have quality judge it under the agreed method, then compare accepted and rejected samples under recorded lighting and repeatable presentation.
2分Quality accepted the retained bezel. Separate faint reject selected. Holder seating still needs checking.
10分Keep the original views. They may help explain the seating problem, even though their scratch labels were unsupported.
16分And include that faint reject in the eventual holder and lighting comparison, because making every bright line disappear is a very easy way to miss the scratch as well.
11分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .