our FR10 bezel examples disagree with each other

RaviCarter0998 · 13 Oct 2025, 09:43 UTC

Closed
RA
RaviCarter0998
One bezel, three moving bright lines, three scratch labels. No physical defect locations recorded. Tuning is premature.

4 replies

NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to RaviCarter0998

Tie each image to the identified physical bezel and have quality judge it under the agreed method, then compare accepted and rejected samples under recorded lighting and repeatable presentation.

2 points
RA
RaviCarter0998
Replying to NoraAllen0322

Quality accepted the retained bezel. Separate faint reject selected. Holder seating still needs checking.

10 points
LE
LeoBrown0884
Replying to RaviCarter0998

Keep the original views. They may help explain the seating problem, even though their scratch labels were unsupported.

16 points
NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to RaviCarter0998

And include that faint reject in the eventual holder and lighting comparison, because making every bright line disappear is a very easy way to miss the scratch as well.

11 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .