简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which rotated FR10 carton positions actually have their required support?

BenBarnes0544 · 2026年6月19日 10:27 UTC

回复讨论
BE
BenBarnes0544
Our component-case pattern fits neatly but bridges gaps under preferred bearing areas. Where should packaging and tooling begin their shared review?

18 条回复

YA
YasminAdams0093

Start with the packed case's required bearing areas over the layer underneath, then put the tool's release and withdrawal into that same arrangement; the neat outside rectangle answers neither question on its own.

22
BE
BenBarnes0544

We have the packing support sketch. Tooling's view shows an isolated closed gripper, not cartons already placed.

24
RE
RebeccaAli0256

Include incomplete layers. I have been asking that on other patterns because the last order rarely ends exactly where the drawing likes it

24
OL
OliverAdams0102

And agree who handles the last few cases. An unsupported partial pattern cannot be fixed merely by writing manual finish beside it

6
RE
RebeccaArcher0430

Oliver, agreed, but that does not rule out a separately assessed manual finishing method if the project wants one; it means the handling method and space need their own decision.

9
YA
YasminAdams0093

Ben, has packaging identified particular rejected positions yet, or only asked for the missing support view?

25
BE
BenBarnes0544

Only asked for the view. I won't call any position rejected until they assess the actual packed-case support.

24
OL
OliverAdams0102

Rebecca Archer, yes, separately assessed was my point. I do not want the drawing's missing last step quietly assigned to whoever is nearest

20
RE
RebeccaAli0256

Ben, does dispatch need particular label faces visible? That could constrain any alternative orientation you later consider

9
BE
BenBarnes0544

Two outside faces need readable labels. Dispatch has added that to the review, with partial loads included. Thanks Rebecca Ali for raising unfinished layers.

23
RE
RebeccaArcher0430

Then keep those requirements beside any proposed change, since rotating a case to improve support could leave the downstream worker turning an entire load to identify it.

1
YA
YasminAdams0093

Has the combined view exposed an actual support conflict now, Ben?

18
BE
BenBarnes0544

Yes. Packaging rejected the turned end row as drawn. Tooling has not assessed withdrawal on a replacement layout yet.

12
OL
OliverAdams0102

I had that outcome on a separate pattern. We compared a revised alternating arrangement with an aligned one; neither earned approval just by avoiding the first rejected row

6
BE
BenBarnes0544

Our designer is proposing an aligned candidate now. No replacement pattern chosen; label visibility and partial loads remain requirements.

16
RE
RebeccaAli0256

What does that candidate do to pallet count? Worth knowing before everyone grows attached to the simpler picture

15
YA
YasminAdams0093

And ask tooling to show withdrawal beside placed neighbours, not return to the isolated gripper view for the new candidate.

17
BE
BenBarnes0544

Pallet-count effect not supplied yet. I've kept it open with withdrawal and dispatch checks, rather than replacing one accepted stamp with another.

20

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。