简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
HanaChan1057 · 2026年9月4日 07:54 UTC
Show packaging that exact layer. Neat rectangles aren't a load assessment
12分They are on today's review call. I have added the base-edge positions to the drawing and asked the tool supplier to bring the full gripper envelope.
12分Include the layer below. The gap is a relationship between layers
20分We did a similar review and everybody argued about the top layer while stores quietly supplied a different pallet. Can you put the pallet construction in that pack too? Boards and gaps, not just its footprint.
8分Yep, actual pallet variant. Not whichever model came free with the drawing software
7分Our simulated tool cleared until we added the already placed cartons. Include the full placement sequence and release positions; a single isolated carton can make a poor pattern look feasible
6分Especially the last placement before the layer changes
22分The supplier's image contains only the carton being placed. They will add neighbouring cartons and show the two layer transitions. We also have the actual pallet drawing now.
13分Ask what the operator sees when the wrong carton orientation arrives. You can approve a pattern all day and still load it wrong if the incoming label has no reliable relationship to those supported edges.
-2分The printed end panel is tied to the packing orientation according to our work instruction. I have not checked whether production consistently follows that instruction.
10分Then put that on the review list as an observation needed from packing. The instruction tells you the intended relationship. Actual packed stock tells you whether you can rely on it today.
17分And don't claim reliability from the one sample sitting in the meeting room
9分Packaging wants to assess a revised pattern with fewer rotated positions. The tooling supplier says that changes its placement order. Neither is ready to approve the original layout.
7分That's useful even if the meeting feels less tidy now. Who updates the drawing both suppliers are using? Ours left with different versions and spent the next call disagreeing about a carton that had already moved.
5分Our project engineer owns the shared revision. I am listing support, incoming orientation and tool sequence as unresolved points against that one candidate pattern.
0分Mark any geometry assumptions in the model as well. The next reviewer should be able to distinguish measured packaging and tooling from provisional outlines without finding the meeting recording
10分Has the original approval request been withdrawn? People do click old attachments
4分Yes. I have replaced it with a review-required revision and a list of evidence still needed. Packed-stock checks and the revised sequence review will follow; nothing is cleared for production.
3分That's an honest status. Now the drawing and the unresolved questions agree
4分