I cannot choose scratch labels from these bezel pictures

John_Bowen · 2026年2月3日 02:09 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JO
John_Bowen
I have two pictures of the same aluminium bezel, one marked good and one scratched. The bright line changes place. Our FR10 inspection is not commissioned; I need labels our next shift can understand.

17 条回复

SA
SarahBaker0502
回复 John_Bowen

Find the bezel first. Pictures alone won't settle its condition.

9分
NI
NinaBennett0762
回复 John_Bowen

And keep both pictures. The wrong label is useful to explain, even after you correct it.

18分
JO
John_Bowen

We have the bezel. Quality found a small nick by a hole, but not where either bright line appears. I had expected one fault or the other, not both.

9分
SA
SarahBaker0502
回复 John_Bowen

Two separate things, yep. Can the camera actually see that nick?

11分
NI
NinaBennett0762

Sarah's question matters more than the shiny line now. Is the nick in the area this inspection is supposed to cover?

23分
HE
HenryAli0177
回复 John_Bowen

I would also ask who assigned the first two labels. A training folder can carry an early guess for months because everyone assumes someone else checked it. That is especially awkward when a new shift treats the folder as the answer key.

11分
SA
SarahBaker0502

Henry, ours had that. A folder called final. Naturally there were three of them.

15分
JO
John_Bowen

Sarah and Nina: the nick is in scope and visible, though faint. Henry: I made the labels from the pictures. I will correct them with quality rather than ask the next shift to guess.

18分
IM
ImranArcher0392
回复 John_Bowen

When you say the line changes place, John, does it move across the metal or only across the picture? I got caught by that distinction when comparing two parts that were framed differently.

6分
JO
John_Bowen

Across the metal. It crosses a different hole in the second picture. The nick stays beside the same hole.

12分
HE
HenryAli0177
回复 John_Bowen

That gives you a useful teaching pair: the same physical nick under two presentations, with the changing reflection identified separately. Keep the full images too; close crops can hide the presentation difference you are trying to explain.

18分
SA
SarahBaker0502

Don't crop out the hole. It's doing useful work here.

17分
IM
ImranArcher0392
回复 John_Bowen

Thanks, John. That answers what I was trying to ask. I would still keep a clean bezel beside it, because otherwise your set only teaches people about one damaged part.

13分
NI
NinaBennett0762

A clean bezel and a borderline one if quality can supply it. Obvious damage is the easy example.

17分
JO
John_Bowen

Quality has supplied an accepted bezel with a similar finish. Our corrected pair now shows the nick, not the moving line, as the defect. I have left threshold selection out of this exercise.

21分
HE
HenryAli0177
回复 John_Bowen

Can the next shift locate the nick from your new page without you standing beside them? That would be a useful check on the handover wording.

7分
SA
SarahBaker0502

And let them say the picture's rubbish if it is.

17分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .