Our UR5e vision proposal contains two images of the same brushed stainless trim plate. The bright line moves after reseating, but both files carry the same scratch label. I have asked quality to examine the retained plate. What should accompany that judgement so the image comparison remains useful?
The trim-plate label stays fixed while its bright line moves
LinBell0618 · 2025年10月26日 16:13 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
回复 LinBell0618
Keep the full images and the seating details. A close crop of the line can lose the orientation difference that explains why the two views look different.
19分回复 LinBell0618
Does the retained plate still have an identity that links it to both photographs?
11分Yes, Alex. The sample tag appears in each full frame. Elliot, I have kept those frames and the two holder positions rather than only the defect crops.
10分回复 LinBell0618
A sample we retained for another review was handled enough to change its condition, so record when quality examines this one as well as its identity.
3分Sarah, that matters for teaching examples too. We need to distinguish the physical judgement made now from whatever somebody assumed when they named the old file.
18分Quality has accepted the plate in its present condition. The old scratch labels are withdrawn. We will capture it again under the agreed viewing conditions and keep the earlier images as presentation examples.
20分回复 LinBell0618
Who maintains the sample set when Lin is away?
8分The inspection technician will own it, with the sample identities, judgement and capture conditions together. I am also adding a rejected plate once quality selects one.
15分回复 LinBell0618
Has the holder comparison explained the moving line, Lin, or is that still separate work while the reference set is rebuilt?
18分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .