简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LinBell0618 · 2025年10月26日 16:13 UTC
Keep the full images and the seating details. A close crop of the line can lose the orientation difference that explains why the two views look different.
19分Does the retained plate still have an identity that links it to both photographs?
11分Yes, Alex. The sample tag appears in each full frame. Elliot, I have kept those frames and the two holder positions rather than only the defect crops.
10分A sample we retained for another review was handled enough to change its condition, so record when quality examines this one as well as its identity.
3分Sarah, that matters for teaching examples too. We need to distinguish the physical judgement made now from whatever somebody assumed when they named the old file.
18分Quality has accepted the plate in its present condition. The old scratch labels are withdrawn. We will capture it again under the agreed viewing conditions and keep the earlier images as presentation examples.
20分Who maintains the sample set when Lin is away?
8分The inspection technician will own it, with the sample identities, judgement and capture conditions together. I am also adding a rejected plate once quality selects one.
15分Has the holder comparison explained the moving line, Lin, or is that still separate work while the reference set is rebuilt?
18分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .