LinBell0618 · 26 Oct 2025, 16:13 UTC
Keep the full images and the seating details. A close crop of the line can lose the orientation difference that explains why the two views look different.
19 pointsDoes the retained plate still have an identity that links it to both photographs?
11 pointsYes, Alex. The sample tag appears in each full frame. Elliot, I have kept those frames and the two holder positions rather than only the defect crops.
10 pointsA sample we retained for another review was handled enough to change its condition, so record when quality examines this one as well as its identity.
3 pointsSarah, that matters for teaching examples too. We need to distinguish the physical judgement made now from whatever somebody assumed when they named the old file.
18 pointsQuality has accepted the plate in its present condition. The old scratch labels are withdrawn. We will capture it again under the agreed viewing conditions and keep the earlier images as presentation examples.
20 pointsWho maintains the sample set when Lin is away?
8 pointsThe inspection technician will own it, with the sample identities, judgement and capture conditions together. I am also adding a rejected plate once quality selects one.
15 pointsHas the holder comparison explained the moving line, Lin, or is that still separate work while the reference set is rebuilt?
18 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .