I can't choose the stand position without losing fixture access

AmaraBarnes0600 · 2025年5月16日 13:08 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AM
AmaraBarnes0600
Our FR10 proposal loads polymer blanks into a mill, and both suggested stand positions seem awkward for the person changing fixtures; one blocks the trolley and the other leaves a narrow route past the open door, so I'm trying to find out whether we need a different layout before the purchase gets signed off

21 条回复

JO
JonasBell0633

At our first layout review the trolley was a rectangle without a handle, which made the available space look generous. Put the actual trolley outline and the fixture-change sequence into both views before rejecting either position.

11分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

The trolley handle is there, but not the person pulling it, and I hadn't noticed that until you mentioned the sequence

2分
JA
JaneBrown0945

Why two positions only? Somebody has drawn two dots and now everyone is defending a dot.

23分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

One follows the supplier's standard arrangement and the other avoids our parts rack, though the rack itself isn't fixed

14分
JO
JonasBell0633

Then include a third arrangement with the rack moved. I would not discard the standard layout merely because it is standard, but its convenience for the supplier should not determine your fixture-change route.

22分
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

How often do you change the whole fixture?

-1分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

Usually between product batches, sometimes twice in a shift, which is why stores is getting a vote on this one

12分
FE
FelixChan1067

Include how the fixture is disconnected and carried, not only the trolley movement. The people doing that work should review the arrangement, because reaching a connection behind the stand can be a bigger nuisance than moving a rack.

14分
JA
JaneBrown0945

Twice a shift? Yes, move the rack on paper first. That's a much cheaper experiment than ordering a robot and discovering you've built a hurdle.

11分
JO
JonasBell0633

Rack movement can affect replenishment too. I would ask whoever fills it where they would put it, rather than leave that as someone else's problem after the robot layout is chosen.

9分
JA
JaneBrown0945

On paper, Jonas. I'm not sending anyone out with a pallet truck yet.

22分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

The stores operator has suggested turning the rack, which leaves the replenishment side facing the aisle and gives us another base location to draw

8分
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Does that location still reach the far fixture pocket with a blank?

21分
FE
FelixChan1067

And is the planned gripper final enough to check? A different finger length can alter this comparison even when the base stays put.

25分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

The body is selected but the fingers aren't, so I've asked for a provisional loaded outline with the uncertainty marked instead of another tidy reach circle

9分
JO
JonasBell0633

That gives you something useful to discuss. Keep the fixture-changing view alongside it; I have seen an access improvement for the arm quietly remove the clearance that maintenance had just requested.

13分
JA
JaneBrown0945

I'd be fine calling it provisional. I wouldn't be fine pricing it as finished.

3分
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Same. Fingers first, purchase later.

4分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

Thanks for the rack suggestion, Jane, that has opened up a sensible third option without pretending the loaded-tool check is done

7分
JO
JonasBell0633

Did the stores operator also have room to replenish it in that orientation? I meant to ask about the actual approach, not simply which way the rack faces.

18分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .