I can't choose the stand position without losing fixture access
AmaraBarnes0600 · 16 May 2025, 13:08 UTC
21 replies
At our first layout review the trolley was a rectangle without a handle, which made the available space look generous. Put the actual trolley outline and the fixture-change sequence into both views before rejecting either position.
11pointsThe trolley handle is there, but not the person pulling it, and I hadn't noticed that until you mentioned the sequence
2pointsWhy two positions only? Somebody has drawn two dots and now everyone is defending a dot.
23pointsOne follows the supplier's standard arrangement and the other avoids our parts rack, though the rack itself isn't fixed
14pointsThen include a third arrangement with the rack moved. I would not discard the standard layout merely because it is standard, but its convenience for the supplier should not determine your fixture-change route.
22pointsHow often do you change the whole fixture?
-1pointsUsually between product batches, sometimes twice in a shift, which is why stores is getting a vote on this one
12pointsInclude how the fixture is disconnected and carried, not only the trolley movement. The people doing that work should review the arrangement, because reaching a connection behind the stand can be a bigger nuisance than moving a rack.
14pointsTwice a shift? Yes, move the rack on paper first. That's a much cheaper experiment than ordering a robot and discovering you've built a hurdle.
11pointsRack movement can affect replenishment too. I would ask whoever fills it where they would put it, rather than leave that as someone else's problem after the robot layout is chosen.
9pointsOn paper, Jonas. I'm not sending anyone out with a pallet truck yet.
22pointsThe stores operator has suggested turning the rack, which leaves the replenishment side facing the aisle and gives us another base location to draw
8pointsDoes that location still reach the far fixture pocket with a blank?
21pointsAnd is the planned gripper final enough to check? A different finger length can alter this comparison even when the base stays put.
25pointsThe body is selected but the fingers aren't, so I've asked for a provisional loaded outline with the uncertainty marked instead of another tidy reach circle
9pointsThat gives you something useful to discuss. Keep the fixture-changing view alongside it; I have seen an access improvement for the arm quietly remove the clearance that maintenance had just requested.
13pointsI'd be fine calling it provisional. I wouldn't be fine pricing it as finished.
3pointsSame. Fingers first, purchase later.
4pointsThanks for the rack suggestion, Jane, that has opened up a sensible third option without pretending the loaded-tool check is done
7pointsDid the stores operator also have room to replenish it in that orientation? I meant to ask about the actual approach, not simply which way the rack faces.
18pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .