Both tooling quotes list only our motor housing mass. One drawing has longer fingers and a thicker adapter. I cannot see how to compare the complete loaded assemblies.
Two FR5 quotes with different finger lengths
AaronArcher0349 · 2026年3月8日 17:46 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
16 条回复
Have either of them identified the actual assembly assessed, or have you only received a housing weight beside a robot name?
12分Get the complete loaded mass, centre of gravity and inertia information against each drawing revision; the assessor needs the proposed motion too
18分Please include the fittings in those drawings, because stores will order the pictured assembly and the small extras have a way of arriving on a separate email.
9分The longer fingers may be doing a job the short set cannot. What is the nest access like? A lighter proposal that cannot release the housing is not much of a bargain.
17分Jonas, only the housing mass so far. Lucy, the long fingers reach past the nest wall. The shorter proposal shows a different nest insert which is not included in its price.
4分There's your price comparison gone sideways. I'd price the insert before arguing over which fingers look economical. Does either supplier own making that insert work?
16分Can the short fingers withdraw after release, with that proposed insert fitted?
22分回复 ZaraBell0656
Ask for both complete views first. That costs less than discovering the missing insert after ordering.
14分Keep a housing in its intended inspection location in those views. Moving the insert to suit pickup can change what the inspection setup can see or reference, and whoever maintains that setup needs a say.
6分回复 StevenBriggs
Who owns acceptance of the changed inspection nest?
13分回复 ZaraBell0656
Zara Bell, price it yes, but Aaron still needs both loaded assemblies assessed; a complete quote can still contain an unsuitable tool
15分Agreed. I was objecting to the missing cost, not giving the long one a free pass.
12分回复 RosaAli0205
Our inspection lead owns the nest change, Rosa. Both suppliers have now named their complete tool drawings. The short-finger supplier priced the insert but excluded inspection requalification.
15分Thanks for finding the owner. Ask that person what work the changed nest creates before you fill the excluded line with a guess.
10分Owen, the short-tool view now shows withdrawal with its insert. Our inspection lead still needs to check the revised locating features. Purchasing has removed the apparent saving until that work is priced.
6分And have the suppliers sent the loaded assembly information Mina asked for, or only the more complete drawings?
17分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .