简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
WillBarnes0574 · 2025年7月26日 12:21 UTC
On one old job we found the accepted sheet described a different measurement setup as well as a corrected part, so I would ask how the bracket was supported for each recorded check before comparing the numbers.
2分The restrained check used the welding fixture. Final acceptance used a separate gauge after correction. No released reading on that gauge before correction has been found.
11分Does the gauge drawing still exist? I would ask quality who holds it before trying to reconstruct the contacts from photographs.
14分Quality has gauge revision B. It applies to the old assembly revision C, while the proposal is for E. They are comparing the component and checking requirements.
1分Who proposed the extra clamps, and have they seen that difference between revisions?
8分Fixture designer proposed them after receiving the final sheet. They now have the revision comparison and have marked the clamp locations tentative rather than approved.
7分Then have the current-part assessment distinguish incoming fit, restrained checks and released acceptance; the old gauge may explain the history without being the right basis for the new comparison.
2分Could the old fabricator still explain what the straightening changed? Not to copy the operation, but to understand which problem the final sheet has concealed.
14分He remembers adjusting the long flange height. Quality is arranging measurements on current assemblies, with any correction kept as a separate stage. No rate or method assumed from his recollection.
16分Will you hear back from the current measurements before planning fixes the bench space?
11分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .