简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Two meanings of lathe ready

MinaAbbott0076 · 2026年3月8日 15:49 UTC

已关闭
MI
MinaAbbott0076
I put both teams' sequence drawings side by side. The machine supplier raises ready when it accepts our request; our UR5e integrator uses ready to start the loading stage. Which event should keep the name?

20 条回复

OM
OmarArcher0404

Neither until they agree what it means. Renaming one signal is cheap; quietly keeping two meanings will follow you into every fault discussion.

18
OM
OmarAli0230

I'd be happier renaming both. Did either team actually describe what happens if the request is received but the loading area isn't available yet?

4
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

And please get the words on the eventual operator screen to match, otherwise a covering operator will inherit the argument without either drawing.

13
MI
MinaAbbott0076

The machine drawing stays in preparation. The robot drawing has already advanced. They used the same arrow number as well, which hid the difference during our first meeting.

-1
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Is another permission shown, or just that ready arrow?

17
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Separate safety conditions are outside this process sketch. The missing process event is loading access available. I have asked both teams to show that explicitly, not treat request acceptance as a substitute.

8
OM
OmarArcher0404

Good. Now put a delayed preparation example through those arrows; the happy-path picture let both teams think they agreed.

8
OM
OmarAli0230

Omar, I'd do the delay before anybody redraws the whole thing. Let each team say where it waits on the existing sketch and write down the disagreement there.

15
OM
OmarArcher0404

That's what I meant by through the arrows.

23
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

Mina, who is writing the screen wording once these events have names?

20
MI
MinaAbbott0076

The integrator owns the screen text. I sent them the delayed-preparation example first. Thanks, Omar Ali; marking the two different waiting points made the call much shorter.

12
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Amara, I have also put the screen wording on their list. It was absent from both teams' handover scope.

4
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Does cancellation leave either team still waiting for the old request?

14
OM
OmarAli0230

That's the awkward one. The request can disappear while preparation is still finishing. I don't know their interface, but I'd want to hear what each side thinks it is acknowledging then.

13
OM
OmarArcher0404

Have they agreed on the names yet, Mina?

9
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Request accepted and loading access available are agreed. Cancellation exposed another difference: the machine team had retained the accepted request, while the robot sketch started a new exchange.

10
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

Will the operator see that an exchange was cancelled, or only that the cell is waiting?

3
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Only waiting in the current screen draft. The integrator is revising it to distinguish the cancelled exchange. We have not settled how a fresh request is authorised after that.

10
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Useful catch before implementation. Who owns that remaining decision?

12
OM
OmarArcher0404

I'd keep the cancellation example attached to the agreed names, Mina; it's the bit someone will otherwise drop when they tidy up the drawing.

21

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .