Two meanings of lathe ready

MinaAbbott0076 · 2026年3月8日 15:49 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

MI
MinaAbbott0076
I put both teams' sequence drawings side by side. The machine supplier raises ready when it accepts our request; our UR5e integrator uses ready to start the loading stage. Which event should keep the name?

20 条回复

OM
OmarArcher0404

Neither until they agree what it means. Renaming one signal is cheap; quietly keeping two meanings will follow you into every fault discussion.

18分
OM
OmarAli0230

I'd be happier renaming both. Did either team actually describe what happens if the request is received but the loading area isn't available yet?

4分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

And please get the words on the eventual operator screen to match, otherwise a covering operator will inherit the argument without either drawing.

13分
MI
MinaAbbott0076

The machine drawing stays in preparation. The robot drawing has already advanced. They used the same arrow number as well, which hid the difference during our first meeting.

-1分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Is another permission shown, or just that ready arrow?

17分
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Separate safety conditions are outside this process sketch. The missing process event is loading access available. I have asked both teams to show that explicitly, not treat request acceptance as a substitute.

8分
OM
OmarArcher0404

Good. Now put a delayed preparation example through those arrows; the happy-path picture let both teams think they agreed.

8分
OM
OmarAli0230

Omar, I'd do the delay before anybody redraws the whole thing. Let each team say where it waits on the existing sketch and write down the disagreement there.

15分
OM
OmarArcher0404

That's what I meant by through the arrows.

23分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

Mina, who is writing the screen wording once these events have names?

20分
MI
MinaAbbott0076

The integrator owns the screen text. I sent them the delayed-preparation example first. Thanks, Omar Ali; marking the two different waiting points made the call much shorter.

12分
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Amara, I have also put the screen wording on their list. It was absent from both teams' handover scope.

4分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Does cancellation leave either team still waiting for the old request?

14分
OM
OmarAli0230

That's the awkward one. The request can disappear while preparation is still finishing. I don't know their interface, but I'd want to hear what each side thinks it is acknowledging then.

13分
OM
OmarArcher0404

Have they agreed on the names yet, Mina?

9分
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Request accepted and loading access available are agreed. Cancellation exposed another difference: the machine team had retained the accepted request, while the robot sketch started a new exchange.

10分
AM
AmaraBarnes0600

Will the operator see that an exchange was cancelled, or only that the cell is waiting?

3分
MI
MinaAbbott0076

Only waiting in the current screen draft. The integrator is revising it to distinguish the cancelled exchange. We have not settled how a fresh request is authorised after that.

10分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Useful catch before implementation. Who owns that remaining decision?

12分
OM
OmarArcher0404

I'd keep the cancellation example attached to the agreed names, Mina; it's the bit someone will otherwise drop when they tidy up the drawing.

21分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .