rotating the cartons moves the support feet off the boards

BenBench · 2025年2月8日 15:42 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

BE
BenBench
I'm planning pallet layers for our FR5 and the box drawing hid two cardboard runners underneath each carton. Rotate the second layer and some runners land over gaps. The pattern looks stable from above, which isn't much comfort now

20 条回复

RA
RaviCarter0998
回复 BenBench

Does packaging specify support beneath those runners, or is that your interpretation?

15分
BE
BenBench

Packaging drawing calls them load-bearing runners. It doesn't show a pallet arrangement

21分
RA
RaviCarter0998
回复 BenBench

Ask packaging to approve the support arrangement. The runner label alone leaves some details unanswered.

18分
MI
MinaBennett0772
回复 BenBench

Check the actual pallets too. Are the gaps where your neat drawing says they are? Our returns had several board layouts under one pallet description.

0分
RA
RaviCarter0998

That matters. Thank you for flagging the pallet variation before we debate the second layer.

4分
LU
LucyBrown0915
回复 BenBench

Your tool still needs a clear approach and release at every placement. A packaging-approved stack can fail as a robot sequence. Put the carton underside, tool envelope and neighbouring cartons into the review together.

4分
RA
RaviCarter0998

Including the last carton in each layer, not just the easy first one.

21分
BE
BenBench

We have two pallet board layouts in stores. I've sent both and the runner drawing to packaging. Tool supplier is checking the complete layer sequence

4分
HA
HarishAllen0315
回复 BenBench

Can I ask what tool you are considering? Side access requirements would make the placement order particularly relevant here.

10分
BE
BenBench

Side gripping concept at present. The runners were meant to leave space under the carton but we haven't chosen fingers

12分
HA
HarishAllen0315
回复 BenBench

Then clarify whether the concept relies on access beneath the carton or contact at its sides; those are different constraints, even if both use fingers.

4分
RA
RaviCarter0998

And neither concept should assume the carton tolerates the intended contact pressure without assessment.

11分
BE
BenBench

Supplier clarified side contact, no lifting fingers underneath. My mistake there. They've asked for packed cartons for a holding and release trial

7分
MI
MinaBennett0772
回复 BenBench

Send the real packed version, then. Empty cartons made our old trial look lovely and told us sod all about the load shifting inside.

17分
BE
BenBench

Packaging rejected one pallet layout for this carton, approved the other for a trial with aligned layers. That changes the original alternating pattern quite a bit

11分
LU
LucyBrown0915
回复 BenBench

Aligned layers are a candidate, not an automatic transport solution. Packaging should evaluate the complete unit load and its restraint. The robot review then needs to use that same candidate, otherwise you'll be approving two different pallets on paper.

6分
RA
RaviCarter0998

Yes. Trial approval is narrower than approval for dispatch.

7分
BE
BenBench

Understood. Nobody has cleared it for shipping. We now have one candidate pallet, actual packed samples and a tool trial booked, so at least we're testing the same thing

19分
RA
RaviCarter0998
回复 BenBench

Have you removed the rejected board layout from the trial stock? Easy to mix them again.

10分
HA
HarishAllen0315

Also identify the pallet variant in the trial record, or rather in the setup specification that will follow it; stores needs something more precise than the approved one.

17分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .