Does packaging specify support beneath those runners, or is that your interpretation?
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
rotating the cartons moves the support feet off the boards
BenBench · 2025年2月8日 15:42 UTC
20 条回复
Packaging drawing calls them load-bearing runners. It doesn't show a pallet arrangement
21分Ask packaging to approve the support arrangement. The runner label alone leaves some details unanswered.
18分Check the actual pallets too. Are the gaps where your neat drawing says they are? Our returns had several board layouts under one pallet description.
0分That matters. Thank you for flagging the pallet variation before we debate the second layer.
4分Your tool still needs a clear approach and release at every placement. A packaging-approved stack can fail as a robot sequence. Put the carton underside, tool envelope and neighbouring cartons into the review together.
4分Including the last carton in each layer, not just the easy first one.
21分We have two pallet board layouts in stores. I've sent both and the runner drawing to packaging. Tool supplier is checking the complete layer sequence
4分Can I ask what tool you are considering? Side access requirements would make the placement order particularly relevant here.
10分Side gripping concept at present. The runners were meant to leave space under the carton but we haven't chosen fingers
12分Then clarify whether the concept relies on access beneath the carton or contact at its sides; those are different constraints, even if both use fingers.
4分And neither concept should assume the carton tolerates the intended contact pressure without assessment.
11分Supplier clarified side contact, no lifting fingers underneath. My mistake there. They've asked for packed cartons for a holding and release trial
7分Send the real packed version, then. Empty cartons made our old trial look lovely and told us sod all about the load shifting inside.
17分Packaging rejected one pallet layout for this carton, approved the other for a trial with aligned layers. That changes the original alternating pattern quite a bit
11分Aligned layers are a candidate, not an automatic transport solution. Packaging should evaluate the complete unit load and its restraint. The robot review then needs to use that same candidate, otherwise you'll be approving two different pallets on paper.
6分Yes. Trial approval is narrower than approval for dispatch.
7分Understood. Nobody has cleared it for shipping. We now have one candidate pallet, actual packed samples and a tool trial booked, so at least we're testing the same thing
19分Have you removed the rejected board layout from the trial stock? Easy to mix them again.
10分Also identify the pallet variant in the trial record, or rather in the setup specification that will follow it; stores needs something more precise than the approved one.
17分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .