rotating the cartons moves the support feet off the boards
BenBench · 8 Feb 2025, 15:42 UTC
20 replies
Does packaging specify support beneath those runners, or is that your interpretation?
15pointsPackaging drawing calls them load-bearing runners. It doesn't show a pallet arrangement
21pointsAsk packaging to approve the support arrangement. The runner label alone leaves some details unanswered.
18pointsCheck the actual pallets too. Are the gaps where your neat drawing says they are? Our returns had several board layouts under one pallet description.
0pointsThat matters. Thank you for flagging the pallet variation before we debate the second layer.
4pointsYour tool still needs a clear approach and release at every placement. A packaging-approved stack can fail as a robot sequence. Put the carton underside, tool envelope and neighbouring cartons into the review together.
4pointsIncluding the last carton in each layer, not just the easy first one.
21pointsWe have two pallet board layouts in stores. I've sent both and the runner drawing to packaging. Tool supplier is checking the complete layer sequence
4pointsCan I ask what tool you are considering? Side access requirements would make the placement order particularly relevant here.
10pointsSide gripping concept at present. The runners were meant to leave space under the carton but we haven't chosen fingers
12pointsThen clarify whether the concept relies on access beneath the carton or contact at its sides; those are different constraints, even if both use fingers.
4pointsAnd neither concept should assume the carton tolerates the intended contact pressure without assessment.
11pointsSupplier clarified side contact, no lifting fingers underneath. My mistake there. They've asked for packed cartons for a holding and release trial
7pointsSend the real packed version, then. Empty cartons made our old trial look lovely and told us sod all about the load shifting inside.
17pointsPackaging rejected one pallet layout for this carton, approved the other for a trial with aligned layers. That changes the original alternating pattern quite a bit
11pointsAligned layers are a candidate, not an automatic transport solution. Packaging should evaluate the complete unit load and its restraint. The robot review then needs to use that same candidate, otherwise you'll be approving two different pallets on paper.
6pointsYes. Trial approval is narrower than approval for dispatch.
7pointsUnderstood. Nobody has cleared it for shipping. We now have one candidate pallet, actual packed samples and a tool trial booked, so at least we're testing the same thing
19pointsHave you removed the rejected board layout from the trial stock? Easy to mix them again.
10pointsAlso identify the pallet variant in the trial record, or rather in the setup specification that will follow it; stores needs something more precise than the approved one.
17pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .