简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
JessBriggs · 2026年3月14日 02:26 UTC
Give both teams the actual filled box and the same lower-layer section. Include the complete fingers through release, not just the box in its final position.
2分Sent. Tooling had shown solid support beneath the turned positions. Packaging has asked for the real lower layer.
2分Does the proposed job include returned partial pallets, Jess? Ours changed substantially once dispatch's real returns were included instead of assuming every pallet started empty.
20分New pallets only. Returned work stays at the existing manual station and is included in the overall staffing estimate.
-4分That boundary helps. We had an old higher-count drawing survive in a quote after the pattern changed, so make sure the supplier prices the same version packaging is assessing.
5分Have the two teams agreed whether the turned positions can remain?
22分They cannot remain with this box construction. Straight-row alternative proposed. Its tool withdrawal still needs drawing.
17分Who is costing the lower count and extra pallet changes? The returned-work allowance does not cover that new work automatically.
11分Dispatch planner. No final cost yet. Both options on the comparison show their actual status.
8分Good. A rejected pattern and an unfinished alternative are perfectly useful things for purchasing to know.
15分