Our proposed alternating layer fits the pallet outline. Two turned product boxes have their required support areas over gaps below. Packaging and tooling have not reviewed the same section.
The FR10 layer puts the box supports over gaps
JessBriggs · 2026年3月14日 02:26 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
10 条回复
回复 JessBriggs
Give both teams the actual filled box and the same lower-layer section. Include the complete fingers through release, not just the box in its final position.
2分Sent. Tooling had shown solid support beneath the turned positions. Packaging has asked for the real lower layer.
2分回复 JessBriggs
Does the proposed job include returned partial pallets, Jess? Ours changed substantially once dispatch's real returns were included instead of assuming every pallet started empty.
20分回复 OmarAli0230
New pallets only. Returned work stays at the existing manual station and is included in the overall staffing estimate.
-4分回复 JessBriggs
That boundary helps. We had an old higher-count drawing survive in a quote after the pattern changed, so make sure the supplier prices the same version packaging is assessing.
5分回复 JessBriggs
Have the two teams agreed whether the turned positions can remain?
22分They cannot remain with this box construction. Straight-row alternative proposed. Its tool withdrawal still needs drawing.
17分回复 JessBriggs
Who is costing the lower count and extra pallet changes? The returned-work allowance does not cover that new work automatically.
11分回复 OmarAli0230
Dispatch planner. No final cost yet. Both options on the comparison show their actual status.
8分回复 JessBriggs
Good. A rejected pattern and an unfinished alternative are perfectly useful things for purchasing to know.
15分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .