Our proposed alternating layer fits the pallet outline. Two turned product boxes have their required support areas over gaps below. Packaging and tooling have not reviewed the same section.
The FR10 layer puts the box supports over gaps
JessBriggs · 14 Mar 2026, 02:26 UTC
10 replies
Replying to JessBriggs
Give both teams the actual filled box and the same lower-layer section. Include the complete fingers through release, not just the box in its final position.
2pointsReplying to GabrielBrown0888
Sent. Tooling had shown solid support beneath the turned positions. Packaging has asked for the real lower layer.
2pointsReplying to JessBriggs
Does the proposed job include returned partial pallets, Jess? Ours changed substantially once dispatch's real returns were included instead of assuming every pallet started empty.
20pointsReplying to OmarAli0230
New pallets only. Returned work stays at the existing manual station and is included in the overall staffing estimate.
-4pointsReplying to JessBriggs
That boundary helps. We had an old higher-count drawing survive in a quote after the pattern changed, so make sure the supplier prices the same version packaging is assessing.
5pointsReplying to JessBriggs
Have the two teams agreed whether the turned positions can remain?
22pointsReplying to GabrielBrown0888
They cannot remain with this box construction. Straight-row alternative proposed. Its tool withdrawal still needs drawing.
17pointsReplying to JessBriggs
Who is costing the lower count and extra pallet changes? The returned-work allowance does not cover that new work automatically.
11pointsReplying to OmarAli0230
Dispatch planner. No final cost yet. Both options on the comparison show their actual status.
8pointsReplying to JessBriggs
Good. A rejected pattern and an unfinished alternative are perfectly useful things for purchasing to know.
15pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .