Bracket correction copied into the FR10 route twice

RosaChan1075 · 2026年2月8日 02:11 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

RO
RosaChan1075
I followed one bracket through our old sheets and found correction under both fabrication and inspection. The FR10 estimate counts both as work, but the notes may describe the same trip to the bench. I want to untangle that without losing the real released failure and the final pass.

17 条回复

HA
HazelChan1093

Do the two entries share the same bracket identity? I've seen inspection note a return to fabrication while fabrication recorded doing it; two entries, one piece of work.

14分
RO
RosaChan1075

Same bracket ID. Inspection says returned for correction; fabrication says corrected and sent back. Both have been given a correction duration in our summary.

17分
SA
SamAllen0333

Identify who observed the work behind each duration before adding them. Inspection may be recording waiting or a handoff, not another correction operation. Preserve the released measurement and its inspection support alongside the route.

13分
SA
SarahBarnes0589

Are the durations original entries, or numbers the estimator added later? That changes what you can recover from the sheet itself.

5分
HA
HazelChan1093

Sarah's question first, Rosa. A perfectly matched pair of bracket entries still cannot supply two times nobody measured.

7分
RO
RosaChan1075

Estimator added the same remembered allowance to both. Original sheets have no duration, just the returned and completed entries. We can identify the route, not time it from these notes.

21分
BE
BethChan1107

Which drawing revision and inspection support belong to the released failure and final pass?

18分
RO
RosaChan1075

Revision K for both, same identified inspection support. Quality checked the readings against K. Released result fails, result after the one correction passes.

19分
SA
SamAllen0333

That is enough to retain the observed route without the doubled allowance. A current timing study should record active correction, waiting and repeat inspection separately, with whoever does each task identified.

15分
SA
SarahBarnes0589

And use the current job for that study. Your old paired entries do not show how often the present brackets need correction.

10分
RO
RosaChan1075

Agreed. The old example is one corrected bracket, not a batch rate. Current process owner and quality will choose the observed work, including first-time passes.

21分
HA
HazelChan1093

Who is correcting the existing estimate, Rosa? Otherwise the double allowance may survive in the version purchasing already has.

11分
RO
RosaChan1075

Our estimator replaced the two correction lines with one explicitly unmeasured operation and separate repeat inspection. Purchasing has that revision. No guessed duration has been retained as a convenient starting value.

23分
BE
BethChan1107

Does the revised description still show the failed released check before that operation? It should not read as optional tidying after an accepted part.

9分
RO
RosaChan1075

Yes, Beth. Failed released check, correction, repeat inspection and final pass are in order. Thanks, Hazel, the one-trip explanation led us back to the actual technician rather than another spreadsheet total.

7分
RO
RosaChan1075

And the technician confirmed one correction trip for that bracket. I've attached that explanation to the old entries so they don't get counted twice again in the next export.

21分
SA
SarahBarnes0589

Useful cleanup. The missing timing remains work for the current study, but the old route no longer invents a second person doing the same correction.

20分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .