I have requested the complete held tool for our polymer-blank unloading review, with unfinished fittings shown as provisional. The FR5 reach sketch is still missing the open machine door. We can survey it, but I want the resulting comparison to include the setter rather than stop at the robot route.
Our FR5 access comparison still needs the open door
MinaBell0685 · 2025年11月3日 15:09 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
回复 MinaBell0685
A layout review I attended gained a usable robot route and lost the operator's trolley route, so ask the setter to mark the actual working and turning space on that same plan.
4分Setter has marked the trolley turning space and the place used to remove the fixture. The initial base proposal overlaps one corner of that space.
8分回复 MinaBell0685
Then give the integrator both issues to compare together, Mina, because moving the stand out of that corner may change the tool approach you are still waiting to assess.
13分Integrator is comparing a narrower stand footprint at the same proposed base location. That is a candidate only. We still need the door measurements and complete loaded route checked.
16分回复 MinaBell0685
Has the setter seen that narrower candidate with a loaded trolley, or only the drawn turning space?
23分Only the drawing so far. I have asked for that comparison and kept his approval pending. A narrower outline also needs the stand designer's assessment, so we have not ordered it.
14分回复 MinaBell0685
Did the door survey reveal another constraint, Mina? Interested whether the same-location candidate is still worth considering alongside those outstanding stand and setter checks.
16分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .