简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LiamChen1186 · 2025年9月1日 04:54 UTC
Ask quality for the released-part instruction first. Price the check you actually need.
11分Quality sent Q8. It checks the base and upright after the correction operation.
9分Send Q8 with the route, then. The supplier needs to see where that check sits.
13分I'd ask for the correction decision too, not just the final measuring time. We have a habit of pricing the tidy inspection bench and forgetting the person who sorts which parts go to the less tidy one.
-2分That decision isn't in Q8. Fabrication has been asked for its earlier check.
14分Does the quote assume the new fixture removes correction altogether? I would want that stated openly if it explains the missing step.
12分Yes, Ella. Supplier expects no correction, but hasn't shown a trial on our current bracket.
9分I've watched that expectation turn into an operator with a hammer beside a supposedly finished cell. Ask for a trial result before removing the work. And don't let the old correction method become the new default without review either.
16分Nina, did they ever put the extra work into the cycle figures, or leave it outside the number?
25分They eventually counted it. The first report timed only the robot and looked fantastic. Full-shift output was rather less impressed.
17分I've requested Q8 inspection pricing and a current-part trial before accepting the no-correction assumption. Fabrication's selection check still outstanding.
15分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .