LiamChen1186 · 1 Sept 2025, 04:54 UTC
Ask quality for the released-part instruction first. Price the check you actually need.
11 pointsQuality sent Q8. It checks the base and upright after the correction operation.
9 pointsSend Q8 with the route, then. The supplier needs to see where that check sits.
13 pointsI'd ask for the correction decision too, not just the final measuring time. We have a habit of pricing the tidy inspection bench and forgetting the person who sorts which parts go to the less tidy one.
-2 pointsThat decision isn't in Q8. Fabrication has been asked for its earlier check.
14 pointsDoes the quote assume the new fixture removes correction altogether? I would want that stated openly if it explains the missing step.
12 pointsYes, Ella. Supplier expects no correction, but hasn't shown a trial on our current bracket.
9 pointsI've watched that expectation turn into an operator with a hammer beside a supposedly finished cell. Ask for a trial result before removing the work. And don't let the old correction method become the new default without review either.
16 pointsNina, did they ever put the extra work into the cycle figures, or leave it outside the number?
25 pointsThey eventually counted it. The first report timed only the robot and looked fantastic. Full-shift output was rather less impressed.
17 pointsI've requested Q8 inspection pricing and a current-part trial before accepting the no-correction assumption. Fabrication's selection check still outstanding.
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .