The lower-count pattern is still in our comparison. Support looks more promising, tool opening still needs review, and dispatch says the extra pallets could block their staging space. I need that cost beside the fancy alternating option, not dismissed as somebody else's department.
Our lower-count FR5 pattern shifts the queue into dispatch
MinaAdams0163 · 2025年11月5日 15:07 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
13 条回复
Ask dispatch to walk through a busy changeover with it. Extra pallet isn't just another footprint if they have to move the previous product out before there's anywhere to put it.
20分I would also ask what the normal collection rhythm is. A staging problem might depend on when pallets leave, though that is not permission to assume a more convenient collection schedule for the robot proposal.
9分Clara, collection rhythm is fixed for this comparison. Jane, the busy changeover is where dispatch predicts the blockage. Quiet single-product runs are easy, as usual.
7分Could the lower-count option be assessed for only the product where it gives the clearest support benefit? A universal pattern might not be the useful target.
13分That adds a pattern change, Aaron, so include how the setter selects and checks the right one rather than assuming the flexibility comes free.
16分Bruno, true, but Mina already has changeovers. It might be a manageable addition, not a reason to force every carton into the same arrangement.
12分回复 JaneAli0249
Aaron, one product is where most of the support concern sits. I'll ask for that limited option too. Bruno and Jane, selection and changeover effort will stay in it. Nobody gets a free clever feature.
17分Can dispatch show the expected pallet buildup using their actual outgoing batches? A sketch with the collection points marked may expose the awkward period before anyone spends time redrawing the station.
6分回复 JaneAli0249
Jane, manageable is all I meant to leave open; I've seen a supposedly automatic recipe change still rely on a handwritten note at the bench.
13分Dispatch did the sketch. The worst overlap is old product waiting to leave while the new batch starts. Extra pallet worsens it, but the overlap exists with either pattern.
7分That is useful to know without charging the entire existing problem to the alternative. What additional handling does the extra pallet cause during that overlap?
15分Still being worked out. I have kept the existing overlap and the added pallet separate in the comparison. Packaging and tool access reviews remain open too.
16分Good. I'd rather see a messy honest comparison than a drawing where all the inconvenient pallets have mysteriously gone home.
12分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .