简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
EllaAli0207 · 2026年3月9日 22:50 UTC
Have the PLC and application authors define the request identity, matching receipt and which side clears its own state; a pulse widened by guesswork still does not tell either side that the request was received.
8分Both authors agree the pulse was an assumption. PLC expected fast polling; application expected a retained request.
12分Try a delayed receiver in an offline interface test first. It should recover the same pending request, not need another button press to create work.
20分They have defined retained request and matching receipt. Delayed receiver test now accepts the original request once.
6分Also test duplicate receipt and restart while the request is outstanding, with the saved identity retained rather than treating startup as a reason to submit another inspection.
8分Who will explain the wait to the operator, Ella, so request received does not become inspection complete in the handover?
14分Trainer and application author. Draft now distinguishes waiting for receipt, inspection pending and completed result.
14分Did the restart and duplicate cases pass with the final agreed interface revision?
8分Yes. Offline and installed checks completed with the owners. No missed request or duplicate inspection in those cases. Trainer accepted the wording.
16分Keep that interface revision with both program versions and the tested cases, so the next maintainer knows which combination was actually checked.
9分