简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
PriyaAli0220 · 2026年7月1日 11:48 UTC
I would separate quoted supply from estimated work and unknown work. Same carton range, presentation task and handover scope for each offer. Otherwise the cheapest column may simply contain the most blank cells.
17分Who's doing the presentation work in the lower offer? A supplier can legitimately leave work to you, but it still takes somebody's time and fixtures. I'd want that visible before asking them to sharpen an arm price.
6分Our staff, apparently. I'd read customer presentation as us providing samples, not preparing every carton.
5分That needs clarification before comparison. A one-time sample provision and repeated preparation belong in different parts of the estimate.
21分Fiona's point can change running cost as well as installation cost. Keep the work frequency beside it. A customer-supplied fixture is not the same exclusion as a person continuously feeding prepared cartons.
9分Priya, does training cover your actual operators and changeovers, or a single demonstration for whoever attends? I've had to budget another session once we named the evening staff who would use the equipment.
2分Day attendees only. Supplier confirmed repeated carton preparation is ours too; both were missing from my comparison.
10分On my estimates I also ask who covers the bench while people train. Paying for a session doesn't make those hours appear out of nowhere.
14分Added staff cover and a second training session as estimates, with presentation labour separate. Guarding scope still needs assessment.
-3分Do not label that guarding line included until the assessed arrangement and supplying party agree. A provisional allowance can be visible without pretending it is a quote.
9分Has the ranking changed, Priya? Interested whether the original price gap survived the added work. Even an incomplete comparison should now explain why one total remains less certain than another.
10分