I imported the old bracket checks for our planned FR10 welding review and initially thought the dimensions jumped at random. The paper sheets have a restrained or released column that never made it into the export.
I'm restoring that field. What other record context should I recover before comparing the results or carrying over the old correction step?
The inspection export lost the restrained-state column
RosaChan1075 · 2025年3月27日 20:12 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
回复 RosaChan1075
Recover part and drawing identities, fixture revision and the measurement reference as well. I'd also keep the original sheet linked to each entry, because the missing state column may not be the only meaning lost in the export.
14分回复 NinaChen1197
The export also merged initial and recheck readings. I've found a correction note between them on one traveller. I'll preserve them as separate observations with that note linked, rather than replacing the first value.
19分回复 RosaChan1075
Yes, otherwise a final accepted value can hide how the part got there. Ask the responsible process person to define that correction before treating the recheck outcome as something the new robot sequence will reproduce.
20分回复 RosaChan1075
Do the rechecks identify the same physical part as the initial reading? I wouldn't infer that solely from their position on a batch sheet.
11分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .