I have asked for the complete tool geometry this time. Both FR10 suppliers still justify suitability using only the motor housing's mass. Their fingers, adapters and fittings are not weightless, and the proposed grip positions differ. I want the whole loaded assembly assessed before buying either proposal.
Two FR10 housing quotes count the part and omit the tool
MinaBell0685 · 2026年3月21日 13:13 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
2 条回复
回复 MinaBell0685
Request the complete loaded mass, centre of gravity and inertia information tied to each assembly drawing and intended motion, then have the responsible assessor compare those actual proposals rather than the housing figure alone.
11分回复 TheoAli0236
Requested from both. One supplier admits its note used a standard short-finger arrangement, not our extended fingers. It is revising the assessment. The other has not supplied the loaded information yet; neither is selected.
19分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .