I have asked for the complete tool geometry this time. Both FR10 suppliers still justify suitability using only the motor housing's mass. Their fingers, adapters and fittings are not weightless, and the proposed grip positions differ. I want the whole loaded assembly assessed before buying either proposal.
Two FR10 housing quotes count the part and omit the tool
MinaBell0685 · 21 Mar 2026, 13:13 UTC
2 replies
Replying to MinaBell0685
Request the complete loaded mass, centre of gravity and inertia information tied to each assembly drawing and intended motion, then have the responsible assessor compare those actual proposals rather than the housing figure alone.
11pointsReplying to TheoAli0236
Requested from both. One supplier admits its note used a standard short-finger arrangement, not our extended fingers. It is revising the assessment. The other has not supplied the loaded information yet; neither is selected.
19pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .