简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
RaviCarter0998 · 2026年6月24日 06:36 UTC
Report both observations with the tray identities and checked conditions. Improvement on the first tray is real evidence, but it doesn't establish reliable tray exchange or explain the later miss.
23分Both trays retained. I wrote improved initial pickups, then a miss after exchange. No cause assigned.
13分Have tooling compare the two trays against the intended locator interface, rather than decide which one is right only by which appeared to work.
11分Tooling found the replacement tray's locating slot differs. The drawing check is still pending.
12分That is a useful difference to investigate. Does your report distinguish the original limited trial result from this new physical finding?
11分Yes. Drawing check now identifies the replacement as another housing variant. It should not have been supplied to this job.
24分Who is fixing the tray supply identification, and who will verify exchange with the correct variant before the report claims the problem is resolved?
7分Stores separated the variant. Tooling and controls own the return check. Thanks Farah for insisting on the drawing comparison.
10分