简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Our FR5 scratch examples move when the faceplate is reseated

CallumBaker0447 · 2025年12月30日 11:13 UTC

已关闭
CA
CallumBaker0447
The same bright-finished faceplate has three different scratch arrows in our proposed FR5 reference folder. Each picture was taken after reseating it. I can see the bright line move, but I can't find a physical inspection decision attached to any of those arrows. Before anyone tunes a threshold, I want quality and the person loading the holder looking at the same actual piece.

6 条回复

CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Can you still match all three images to that faceplate?

10
CA
CallumBaker0447

Yes, marked sample and original captures retained. The arrows were added later. Quality is examining the faceplate before we use any of the labels.

7
HA
HanaAli0187

Could the regular loader show how they place it in the holder? I've seen a tutor make an awkward sample look consistent by giving it a little extra nudge every time. Perfectly obvious to them, invisible to everyone following the printed exercise.

12
HA
HazelAli0223

Is there a confirmed rejected faceplate for comparison as well, Callum?

10
CA
CallumBaker0447

Quality found no scratch at the shifting line on this accepted sample. They have identified a separate faint scuff reject for the comparison. Hana, the loader and holder designer are reviewing the seating together; no new threshold trial yet.

17
CH
ChloeBrooks0831

Have the old arrows been removed from the working examples?

17

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .