The same bright-finished faceplate has three different scratch arrows in our proposed FR5 reference folder. Each picture was taken after reseating it. I can see the bright line move, but I can't find a physical inspection decision attached to any of those arrows. Before anyone tunes a threshold, I want quality and the person loading the holder looking at the same actual piece.
Our FR5 scratch examples move when the faceplate is reseated
CallumBaker0447 · 2025年12月30日 11:13 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
Can you still match all three images to that faceplate?
10分Yes, marked sample and original captures retained. The arrows were added later. Quality is examining the faceplate before we use any of the labels.
7分Could the regular loader show how they place it in the holder? I've seen a tutor make an awkward sample look consistent by giving it a little extra nudge every time. Perfectly obvious to them, invisible to everyone following the printed exercise.
12分Is there a confirmed rejected faceplate for comparison as well, Callum?
10分回复 HazelAli0223
Quality found no scratch at the shifting line on this accepted sample. They have identified a separate faint scuff reject for the comparison. Hana, the loader and holder designer are reviewing the seating together; no new threshold trial yet.
17分Have the old arrows been removed from the working examples?
17分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .