Our FR5 scratch examples move when the faceplate is reseated

CallumBaker0447 · 30 Dec 2025, 11:13 UTC

Closed
CA
CallumBaker0447
The same bright-finished faceplate has three different scratch arrows in our proposed FR5 reference folder. Each picture was taken after reseating it. I can see the bright line move, but I can't find a physical inspection decision attached to any of those arrows. Before anyone tunes a threshold, I want quality and the person loading the holder looking at the same actual piece.

6 replies

CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to CallumBaker0447

Can you still match all three images to that faceplate?

10 points
CA
CallumBaker0447
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

Yes, marked sample and original captures retained. The arrows were added later. Quality is examining the faceplate before we use any of the labels.

7 points
HA
HanaAli0187
Replying to CallumBaker0447

Could the regular loader show how they place it in the holder? I've seen a tutor make an awkward sample look consistent by giving it a little extra nudge every time. Perfectly obvious to them, invisible to everyone following the printed exercise.

12 points
HA
HazelAli0223
Replying to CallumBaker0447

Is there a confirmed rejected faceplate for comparison as well, Callum?

10 points
CA
CallumBaker0447
Replying to HazelAli0223

Quality found no scratch at the shifting line on this accepted sample. They have identified a separate faint scuff reject for the comparison. Hana, the loader and holder designer are reviewing the seating together; no new threshold trial yet.

17 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to CallumBaker0447

Have the old arrows been removed from the working examples?

17 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .