Old bracket fixture has a clamp nobody can explain

NoraAbbott0061 · 2025年2月17日 16:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

NO
NoraAbbott0061
Our FR5 fixture proposal copies an extra clamp from an old welding jig. Records say the released bracket failed inspection. No reason recorded for the extra clamp. I want that assumption challenged before manufacture.

8 条回复

GR
GraceBennett0755

Ask the fixture designer to distinguish the locating features from the restraints on the existing drawing. The extra clamp may have served a legitimate purpose, but copying it does not explain its effect on the final released part.

10分
NO
NoraAbbott0061

Designer marked it as restraint only. The old inspection sheet measures the upright while clamped. The finished drawing specifies the released assembly. Those are different conditions.

9分
GR
GraceBennett0755

Then preserve those conditions in the review, rather than comparing the measurements as though they were equivalent. Do any retained parts have incoming fit-up measurements linked to their final inspection records?

20分
NI
NinaCarter1023

We once traced a fixture change to a different incoming part revision. Are the gusset and angle revisions written against those old batches, or only the finished bracket number?

-2分
GR
GraceBennett0755

That would be useful context for the fit-up question. An apparently unexplained correction can become understandable once the component history is visible, though it still needs assessment for the new process.

10分
NO
NoraAbbott0061

Only the bracket number is consistent. Two retained samples have different gusset revisions. Quality is separating them before measurement; we cannot attribute the old spread to the clamp alone.

6分
GR
GraceBennett0755

That is a defensible limitation. Put ownership of the new fit-up and final acceptance checks into the requirements so the next fixture review has evidence the old records lack.

23分
LE
LeoChan1058

And stop calling the copied clamp a correction in the new specification. It is an unverified legacy feature. Somebody maintaining the cell later will otherwise assume the word means it was tested.

15分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .