Why does this FR5 pallet review show empty cartons again?

Packaging has supplied the insert drawing. Two end supports. The rotated carton in the corner misses one of them in the proposed stack.

Put that exact position in the review, with the tool fingers present. I cannot tell whether the gap can be reduced without their withdrawal view.

Dispatch says fewer per pallet is possible. They want a comparison of pallet movements and storage space. Tool supplier wants more space beside the corner carton, not less.

Then compare an alternative arrangement explicitly, including the actual tool and packaging revisions; a sequence of individually reasonable drawing changes can leave nobody responsible for the combination

Yes, one owner for the combined drawing. Also keep the original count in the comparison so dispatch can see what the support and access constraints cost them

Designer is comparing a lower-count non-rotated arrangement. Packaging wants a loaded trial before approving it. The original pattern is no longer the assumed answer.

Thanks, Julia, for getting dispatch into this. They found a collection route the proposed base would block. That is now included in the layout comparison too.

Has packaging accepted the proposed support for the trial, or are they still specifying it? I'd distinguish permission to test from approval of the finished pallet.