简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

FR10 blank-length sheet with the seating measurements missing

BethBarnes0585 · 2026年4月20日 06:11 UTC

回复讨论
BE
BethBarnes0585
Our setter has handed me a sheet of exposed lengths from hand-loaded aluminium blanks for the FR10 proposal. There's a spread, but no total blank lengths alongside it. He remembers checking the stop; the other setter remembers a different batch of stock. Both could be right, which isn't helping. I can still identify the blanks. What's the smallest useful comparison before this turns into a meeting about which person loads things properly? Automatic loading hasn't been agreed.

6 条回复

LI
LiamAllen0316

Measure those blanks first, including the end that meets the stop. Keep each result paired with its exposed length.

24
BE
BethBarnes0585

Found a length difference between the two stock batches. Not enough to explain all the exposed-length spread, though. One contact end also has a rough patch.

5
KA
KaiBrooks0802

Does the setter have an agreed seating check for these particular blanks, since I would not know whether that rough patch matters just from its appearance?

7
LI
LiamAllen0316

Ask tooling to inspect that contact before deciding it needs alteration.

11
BE
BethBarnes0585

Tooling found raised material at the contact end and the setter repeated the comparison after their correction. That blank now seats consistently. The batch length difference is still there, as expected; we've added both dimensions to the sheet instead of treating exposed length as a verdict on the loader.

25
JA
JamieAdams0121

Can the covering setter tell which blank batch the new sheet applies to? Worth putting the stock reference beside those dimensions, especially if both batches are still on the rack.

16

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。