I've got the same polished cover labelled good on the bench and scratched in our proposed FR5 camera view. Turn it slightly and the bright line walks across the image. Quality can find a small real scratch elsewhere, which barely shows. We're choosing the presentation now, so teaching the camera these labels seems a bit premature.
our reject photo has a streak the cover hasn't got
PriyaCarter1003 · 2025年9月16日 21:35 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
Who labelled the images, and did they have the actual covers beside them?
16分Our project engineer labelled screenshots. Quality inspected the covers separately. I've matched the serial labels now and the screenshot rejects include two covers quality accepted, not just the one I started with.
6分Ask quality to mark the real defect locations on a separate reference image. Otherwise the next handover inherits a folder of confident guesses.
24分We had a trainer pointing at a reflection on every example while the actual blemish sat under the caption, so show the reference without writing over the useful bit
0分Yes, separate annotated copies. I want the original images left alone; someone has already cropped one so closely I can't tell which way the cover was held.
6分That crop would drive me mad. Can your vision person compare a few lighting and presentation options with the same accepted and rejected covers? Including the little real scratch, not just the dramatic streak.
11分Priya, who will maintain that sample set after the project engineer leaves? Covers disappear into useful-looking drawers remarkably quickly.
21分回复 FionaAli0238
Quality has taken the set and added handling notes. Fiona, the comparison found a view where the small scratch is visible without that travelling line, but we still need to check it across the other finishes. At least we're arguing over the right marks now.
24分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .