简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The FR10 panel trial has no second panel to leave behind

HassanArcher0356 · 2025年7月13日 16:36 UTC

已关闭
HA
HassanArcher0356
Our proposed FR10 sheet-panel tool has a satisfactory single-panel seal report, but the production source is a stack and the report contains no separation observation or single-panel confirmation; support through transfer and release into the locating tray also remains unassessed.

7 条回复

IM
ImranAdams0131

Does the proposal include a means of identifying a pair, or does the control description treat vacuum achieved as sufficient to continue?

3
HA
HassanArcher0356

It currently treats the vacuum indication as pickup complete; the supplier has been asked to explain how exactly-one-panel delivery will be confirmed under the specified stack conditions.

13
IM
ImranAdams0131

Include the uncertain result in that request. Someone must decide what happens when the system cannot establish whether one panel or two were picked.

14
HA
HassanArcher0356

The supplier has proposed a separate check, with method details and representative-stack testing still outstanding; no single-panel claim accepted from the existing bench report.

24
IM
ImranAdams0131

Will those tests include the normal surface condition and panel bow? A test on deliberately clean, flat, separated sheets would miss your original question again.

-1
HA
HassanArcher0356

Actual supply conditions are specified, including the film and observed bow range; the tool reviewer is also defining the supported transfer and release assessment rather than treating separation as the only remaining task.

11
IM
ImranAdams0131

Has the proposed check been demonstrated on those conditions, or is it still only an agreed test scope?

13

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .