HassanArcher0356 · 13 Jul 2025, 16:36 UTC
Does the proposal include a means of identifying a pair, or does the control description treat vacuum achieved as sufficient to continue?
3 pointsIt currently treats the vacuum indication as pickup complete; the supplier has been asked to explain how exactly-one-panel delivery will be confirmed under the specified stack conditions.
13 pointsInclude the uncertain result in that request. Someone must decide what happens when the system cannot establish whether one panel or two were picked.
14 pointsThe supplier has proposed a separate check, with method details and representative-stack testing still outstanding; no single-panel claim accepted from the existing bench report.
24 pointsWill those tests include the normal surface condition and panel bow? A test on deliberately clean, flat, separated sheets would miss your original question again.
-1 pointsActual supply conditions are specified, including the film and observed bow range; the tool reviewer is also defining the supported transfer and release assessment rather than treating separation as the only remaining task.
11 pointsHas the proposed check been demonstrated on those conditions, or is it still only an agreed test scope?
13 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .