Why is our UR5e trim-plate scratch drawn in three places?

DineshBrown0908 · 2026年4月6日 18:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

DI
DineshBrown0908
We checked holder seating and can repeat the plate position. The bright streak still moves with small presentation changes. Nobody has compared the arrows with the retained stainless plate. What should quality examine first?

18 条回复

OL
OliverChen1146

The actual areas those arrows point to, with the full images beside the identified plate; no need to buy another lamp before someone does that fairly important bit

14分
DI
DineshBrown0908

Quality found no damage at two arrows. The third points near a real scratch, but not at it. We have kept the plate and marked the actual region in a full view.

19分
JU
JuliaAllen0326

Can the camera specialist show that actual scratch in repeated captures of the permitted presentation range? Use the judged plate rather than a new sample that merely looks similar.

6分
AI
AishaBrooks0866

And stop using the two invented defect labels. They won't improve by waiting for the lighting work.

-3分
CL
ClaraAdams0089

Keep the mistaken images as withdrawn examples, not current references.

6分
DI
DineshBrown0908

The shared reference set is withdrawn. Julia, the scratch is visible at the central presentation but disappears into the bright band near one end of the allowed range.

9分
OL
OliverChen1146

That's a useful problem to give the optical person, Dinesh; the target isn't make a prettier picture now, it's keep that real scratch visible where the part is allowed to be

13分
AI
AishaBrooks0866

Or reduce the presentation range if the actual fixture can support it. Don't let a software setting promise mechanical repeatability.

10分
JU
JuliaAllen0326

Aisha, narrowing the range may be an option, but it should still include the variation of accepted parts and normal seating. Dinesh has established repeatable holder seating, not yet every contributor to the presented surface angle.

9分
CL
ClaraAdams0089

Yes. A smaller box on the drawing doesn't move the real plate.

19分
DI
DineshBrown0908

The fixture designer says the current range is needed for the accepted plate variation. We are keeping it. Camera specialist has a different lighting arrangement to compare using this scratched plate and an accepted one.

17分
OL
OliverChen1146

Will the comparison include the other areas quality needs inspected, Dinesh? I once saw a test get rescued by cropping out everything that made it difficult

10分
JU
JuliaAllen0326

That is worth making explicit. Improved visibility at one defect region should not remove required surface coverage elsewhere. Keep the full required view with the detail images.

6分
DI
DineshBrown0908

Yes, Oliver. New arrangement shows the known scratch throughout the required range and keeps the full inspection area. Quality repeated the accepted and reject examples with the camera specialist. No per-picture tilt correction this time.

24分
AI
AishaBrooks0866

Who resets that arrangement after cleaning?

15分
DI
DineshBrown0908

Our setter. She repeated the documented setup after removing and replacing the holder, with the same reference results. The lamp position and sample references are in the setup sheet. Thank you, Julia, for keeping the allowed range tied to actual parts.

6分
CL
ClaraAdams0089

Has the supplier included that arrangement in its offer?

15分
OL
OliverChen1146

Aisha's cleaning question belongs in that offer too, Dinesh, especially if the final layout makes the lamp harder to reach than on the bench

9分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .