Clamped alignment, released failure, unexplained correction. Which records would separate those before our UR5e plan inherits the routine?
Our UR5e bracket notes lose the measuring conditions after release
AdaBrown0912 · 2026年6月24日 15:02 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
10 条回复
回复 AdaBrown0912
What was actually checked under restraint, Ada? I would establish whether that note is visual alignment or a measurement of the drawing requirement before comparing it with the released result. The word aligned can conceal quite a lot of optimism.
8分回复 TheoChen1193
Visual check while restrained. Released inspection has dimensions, but supports and method aren't on the sheet.
10分回复 AdaBrown0912
Can inspection identify the support arrangement and drawing revision from the linked assembly records? Without those, the released values may not be comparable with final acceptance.
21分Drawing revision matches. Support arrangement is still unknown. Individual identities survive through released and final checks for three brackets.
0分回复 AdaBrown0912
Who recorded the correction between those checks, and does their entry name the individual bracket?
13分Setter entered corrected against the batch. No individual detail. I won't assign the same correction to all three.
11分回复 AdaBrown0912
Use the linked records to identify missing stages for a new study, then. Keep the restrained observation, released values and corrected final result distinct. The welding and inspection owners should define the next comparison rather than let an unexplained batch note become the new cell's process instruction.
25分回复 TheoChen1193
Will ordinary acceptable brackets be included too, not only those selected because they needed attention?
20分Yes, ordinary work is included. Quality owns the support method; process lead owns fit-up and correction entries. Study results pending.
3分回复 AdaBrown0912
Good. Have whoever performs correction enter it directly, so this study does not recreate the batch-level gap.
10分