I've watched both demos for our planned 37 bearing sleeves and both look useful. Trouble is, one used a tidy tray and the other our awkward workshop tray. UR5e is a candidate, not a conclusion. What can I fairly retain from the videos while asking for a comparable trial?
Retain the setup each candidate actually handled. Drop the comparative speed claim, if there is one. A tidy tray is allowed to look tidy without winning an unrelated contest.
I would keep the tray redesign option alive as well. Is your workshop tray a requirement, Ella, or simply the one you currently own? Those lead to different purchasing questions
Mina, yes, provided redesign includes whoever prepares and replenishes the tray. Otherwise we're comparing two robots and quietly donating a person to one of them.
The workshop tray isn't fixed. We can change it, but the sleeves arrive loose and somebody has to load whichever tray we choose. I hadn't included that time in my video notes.
Then I would ask each supplier to price its proposed working arrangement, alongside a common handling example. You might prefer a changed tray, but it should be a visible process choice with preparation included
Rachel, your donated-person point caught me. I had been treating the prepared tray as the starting material. I'll compare from loose sleeves through completed transfer, with the same batch quantity.
One supplier has offered a loading example with our sleeves and its tray; the other is still considering the scope. Neither new run has happened. The old clips are now examples of their own setups, not a league table.