简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
NoraAbbott0061 · 2025年11月26日 19:58 UTC
Ask inspection which readings can be compared after accounting for those references; the old correction time still belongs in the estimate while that remains unanswered.
3分Inspection says the released result is outside the requirement. It cannot calculate a release movement from the restrained reading as recorded.
18分Then drop the calculated movement from the summary. Keep the released failure and its measurement method; those are still relevant to the new fixture plan.
14分Who carried out the old correction work? A short conversation with that person may explain what the notes omit, especially whether they corrected every bracket or only the ones that failed the released check.
18分Lin, worth asking, but I'd mark recollection separately from the inspection readings; the person may remember the worst brackets better than the ordinary ones.
3分The former fabricator is available. I have asked about the sequence and how correction was selected, not for remembered dimensions.
2分Did the component revision change within the old batch? That could explain why some needed different treatment, without saying anything about this proposed fixture.
4分No revision change is recorded in that batch. The fabricator recalls correcting only some brackets, but we have no item-by-item correction list to confirm how many.
7分That is enough to stop calling it an automatic correction after every weld, but not enough to remove the work. Could the next trial follow identified brackets through the released check and any correction separately?
15分Yes. Fabrication and inspection have agreed that trial structure, with the current assembly revision and measurement supports specified. Timing remains unbooked, and correction effort stays provisional.
18分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .