NoraAbbott0061 · 26 Nov 2025, 19:58 UTC
Ask inspection which readings can be compared after accounting for those references; the old correction time still belongs in the estimate while that remains unanswered.
3 pointsInspection says the released result is outside the requirement. It cannot calculate a release movement from the restrained reading as recorded.
18 pointsThen drop the calculated movement from the summary. Keep the released failure and its measurement method; those are still relevant to the new fixture plan.
14 pointsWho carried out the old correction work? A short conversation with that person may explain what the notes omit, especially whether they corrected every bracket or only the ones that failed the released check.
18 pointsLin, worth asking, but I'd mark recollection separately from the inspection readings; the person may remember the worst brackets better than the ordinary ones.
3 pointsThe former fabricator is available. I have asked about the sequence and how correction was selected, not for remembered dimensions.
2 pointsDid the component revision change within the old batch? That could explain why some needed different treatment, without saying anything about this proposed fixture.
4 pointsNo revision change is recorded in that batch. The fabricator recalls correcting only some brackets, but we have no item-by-item correction list to confirm how many.
7 pointsThat is enough to stop calling it an automatic correction after every weld, but not enough to remove the work. Could the next trial follow identified brackets through the released check and any correction separately?
15 pointsYes. Fabrication and inspection have agreed that trial structure, with the current assembly revision and measurement supports specified. Timing remains unbooked, and correction effort stays provisional.
18 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .